Predictors and Clinical Characteristics of Relapses in LGI1-Antibody Encephalitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Relapses occur in 15%-25% of patients with leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 antibody (LGI1-Ab) autoimmune encephalitis and may cause additional disability. In this study, we clinically characterized the relapses and identified factors predicting their occurrence. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of patients with LGI1-Ab encephalitis diagnosed at our center between 2005 and 2022. Relapse was defined as worsening of previous or appearance of new symptoms after at least 3 months of clinical stabilization. RESULTS: Among 210 patients, 30 (14%) experienced a total of 33 relapses. The median time to first relapse was 23.9 months (range: 4.9-110.1, interquartile range [IQR]: 17.8). The CSF was inflammatory in 11/25 (44%) relapses, while LGI1-Abs were found in the serum in 16/24 (67%) and in the CSF in 12/26 (46%); brain MRI was abnormal in 16/26 (62%) relapses. Compared with the initial episode, relapses manifested less frequently with 3 or more symptoms (4/30 patients, 13% vs 28/30, 93%; p < 0.001) and had lower maximal modified Rankin scale (mRS) score (median 3, range: 2-5, IQR: 1 vs 3, range: 2-5, IQR: 0; p = 0.001). The median mRS at last follow-up after relapse (2, range: 0-4, IQR: 2) was significantly higher than after the initial episode (1, range: 0-4, IQR: 1; p = 0.005). Relapsing patients did not differ in their initial clinical and diagnostic features from 85 patients without relapse. Nevertheless, residual cognitive dysfunction after the initial episode (hazard ratio:13.8, 95% confidence interval [1.5; 129.5]; p = 0.022) and no administration of corticosteroids at the initial episode (hazard ratio: 4.8, 95% confidence interval [1.1; 21.1]; p = 0.036) were significantly associated with an increased risk of relapse. DISCUSSION: Relapses may occur years after the initial encephalitis episode and are usually milder but cause additional disability. Corticosteroid treatment reduces the risk of future relapses, while patients with residual cognitive dysfunction after the initial episode have an increased relapse risk.

Case report: Shingles-associated probable Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis with IgM anti-sulfatide positivity.

Background: Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis (BBE) is a rare disease considered caused by acute demyelination of the brainstem, most often resulting from secondary autoimmune responses. To our knowledge, this is the first probable case report of shingles-associated BBE with anti-sulfatide IgM positivity. Case presentation: We report the case of an 83-year-old woman with symptoms of progressive limb weakness, difficulty swallowing food, and disturbed consciousness that occurred 4 weeks following herpes zoster infection. Autoimmune anti-sulfatide antibodies were positive and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences revealed clear high signal intensity in pons and bilateral thalamus. Our patient's condition improved markedly with glucocorticoid treatment. After 2 months of treatment, our patient was fully recovered. We considered that for her case, BBE is the most appropriate diagnosis. Conclusions: We emphasize the importance of a careful medical history and assessment of clinical symptoms, performing MRI, testing autoimmune antibodies for rapid diagnosis, and ruling out differential diagnoses. Further studies involving more patients with BBE with IgM anti-sulfatide autoantibodies will increase the understanding of the clinical characteristics and advance the diagnosis and treatment of this syndrome. Meanwhile, it is crucial for dermatologists to know about this severe neurological complication following shingles.

Autoimmune and paraneoplastic seizures.

Seizures are a common feature of autoimmune encephalitis and are especially prevalent in patients with the commonest autoantibodies, against LGI1, CASPR2 and the NMDA, GABAB, and GABAA receptors. In this chapter, we discuss the classification, clinical, investigation, and treatment aspects of patients with these, and other autoantibody-mediated and -associated, illnesses. We highlight distinctive and common seizure semiologies which, often alongside other features we outline, can help the clinical diagnosis of an autoantibody-associated syndrome. Next, we classify these syndromes by either focusing on whether they represent underlying causative autoantibodies or T-cell-mediated syndromes and on the distinction between acute symptomatic seizures and a more enduring tendency to autoimmune-associated epilepsy, a practical and valuable distinction for both patients and clinicians which relates to the pathogenesis. We emphasize the more effective immunotherapy response in patients with causative autoantibodies, and discuss the emerging evidence for various first-, second-, and third-line immunotherapies. Finally, we highlight available clinical rating scales which can guide autoantibody testing and immunotherapy in patients with seizures of unknown etiology. Throughout, we relate the clinical and therapeutic observations to the immunobiology and neuroscience which drive these seizures.

Optimizing the diagnostic performance of neural antibody testing for paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice.

The detection of neural antibodies in patients with paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis has majorly advanced the diagnosis and management of neural antibody-associated diseases. Although testing for these antibodies has historically been restricted to specialized centers, assay commercialization has made this testing available to clinical chemistry laboratories worldwide. This improved test accessibility has led to reduced turnaround time and expedited diagnosis, which are beneficial to patient care. However, as the utilization of these assays has increased, so too has the need to evaluate how they perform in the clinical setting. In this chapter, we discuss assays for neural antibody detection that are in routine use, draw attention to their limitations and provide strategies to help clinicians and laboratorians overcome them, all with the aim of optimizing neural antibody testing for paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice.

Case report: Successful treatment of an anti-D2R and DPPX antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis patient with high-dose methylprednisolone and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Background: Autoimmune encephalitis is a neurological condition caused by abnormal immune responses, manifesting as cognitive impairments, behavioral abnormalities, and seizures. Its diagnosis depends on the detecting neuronal surface antibodies in serum or cerebrospinal fluid. Despite recent advances in understanding, clinical recognition remains challenging, especially with rare antibodies such as anti-dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) and anti-dipeptidyl-peptidase-like protein 6 (DPPX) antibodies. Delayed diagnosis can lead to severe complications. This case presentation emphasizes the diagnostic intricacies and effective treatment of the anti-D2R and DPPX antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis. Case description: The patient presented with a 3-day history of fatigue and limb soreness followed by a 3-h episode of confusion and limb convulsions. Upon admission to our facility, the initial diagnosis included status epilepticus, aspiration pneumonia, metabolic acidosis, respiratory alkalosis, and suspected encephalitis. Despite receiving antiepileptic, anti-infection, and antivirus therapy, the patient's condition deteriorated. Both computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed no significant abnormalities. No pathogen was identified in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). However, further CSF and serum examination revealed positive results of anti-D2R and anti-DPPX antibodies, confirming a diagnosis of anti-D2R and DPPX antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis. The patient underwent a comprehensive treatment regimen, including high-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy combined with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), antiviral and anti-infection treatments, and antiepileptic medications. Significant clinical improvement was observed, and by the 18th day of admission, the patient was stable and coherent. Conclusions: The current patient represents the first reported case of double-positive autoimmune encephalitis for anti-D2R and DPPX antibodies, with epilepsy as a prominent feature. High-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy combined with IVIG has shown significant safety and efficacy in treating anti-D2R and DPPX antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis-associated epilepsy.

[Clinical characteristics of seizure-predominant autoimmune encephalitis and utility of anti-neuronal antibody scores for early treatment].

We analyzed 20 patients diagnosed with autoimmune neurological diseases with seizure predominance. In these patients, we examined the usefulness of Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy and Encephalopathy (APE2) score and Antibodies Contributing to Focal Epilepsy Signs and Symptoms (ACES) score in autoimmune encephalitis (AE) for facilitating early treatment. APE2 score was positive in 19 of 20 patients. ACES score was positive in 15 of 20 patients, and 4 of 5 of the patients with negative ACES score did not have AE. Comprehensive assessment including the use of the above scores is desirable in the early stage of AE.

Seroprevalence of neuronal antibodies in diseases mimicking autoimmune encephalitis.

Detection of neuronal antibodies for autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes relies on commercially available cell-based assays and lineblots. However, lineblots may reveal the presence of neuronal antibodies in patients with various non-autoimmune etiologies. Herein we describe patients with non-autoimmune etiologies (cohort B) and detectable neuronal antibodies and compare them to definite cases of autoimmune encephalitis (cohort A) for differences in clinical data. All patients positive for at least one neuronal antibody were retrospectively evaluated for autoimmune encephalitis and/or paraneoplastic neurological syndrome between 2016 and 2022. 39 cases in cohort B and 23 in cohort A were identified. In cohort B, most common diagnoses were neurodegenerative disorders in 9/39 (23.1%), brain tumors in 6/39 (15.4%) while most common detected antibodies were anti-titin (N10), anti-recoverin (N11), anti-Yo (N8) and all were detected in serum only. Differential aspects between cohort A and B were CSF pleocytosis (14/23 (60.8%) vs 11/35 (31.4%), p = 0.042, respectively), MRI features suggestive of encephalitis (6/23 (26.1%) vs 0 (0%), p = 0.002, respectively) and epilepsy restricted to temporal lobes (14/23 (60.9%) vs 2/30 (6.7%), p = 0.0003, respectively). A large proportion of lineblot results were non-specific when only serum was tested and were frequently found in non-autoimmune neurological conditions.

Autoimmune and inflammatory neurological disorders in the intensive care unit.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review summarizes the diagnostic approach to autoimmune encephalitis (AE) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and provides practical guidance on therapeutic management. RECENT FINDINGS: Autoimmune encephalitis represents a group of immune-mediated brain diseases associated with antibodies that are pathogenic against central nervous system proteins. Recent findings suggests that the diagnosis of AE requires a multidisciplinary approach including appropriate recognition of common clinical syndromes, brain imaging and electroencephalography to confirm focal pathology, and cerebrospinal fluid and serum tests to rule out common brain infections, and to detect autoantibodies. ICU admission may be necessary at AE onset because of altered mental status, refractory seizures, and/or dysautonomia. Early management in ICU includes prompt initiation of immunotherapy, detection and treatment of seizures, and supportive care with neuromonitoring. In parallel, screening for neoplasm should be systematically performed. Despite severe presentation, epidemiological studies suggest that functional recovery is likely under appropriate therapy, even after prolonged ICU stays. CONCLUSION: AE and related disorders are increasingly recognized in the ICU population. Critical care physicians should be aware of these conditions and consider them early in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with unexplained encephalopathy. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory for diagnosis, ICU management, specific therapy, and prognostication.

[Autoimmune encephalitis: psychiatric aspects]. / Autoimmunnye entsefality: psikhiatricheskie aspekty.

Autoimmune encephalitis is a group of diseases researched by both neurologists and psychiatrists. Despite a large number of studies and practical recommendations, the differential diagnosis and early diagnostics still remains an important issue. The most difficult to diagnose are cases that debut as mental disorders and/or occur without neurological symptoms. The literature review presents the current state of the problem with an emphasis on the practice of a psychiatrist.

Diagnosis of an immunocompetent adult with acute headache and fever as Epstein-Barr virus encephalitis by mNGS of cerebrospinal fluid.

Complicated case with fever or headache of unknown origin is currently one of the main challenges in clinical diagnosis. A retrospective analysis was conducted on a 27-year-old female patient hospitalized with headache and fever, and the pathogen species were ultimately determined by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The culture results of CSF showed no bacterial or fungal growth. CSF cytology showed a significant increase in nucleated cells. Pathogenic index (corresponded to human gamma herpesvirus 4) of the microorganism after correcting for human background was 12846.77 with a host index (human resource) of 27822.48 by mNGS of CSF. The patient improved through antiviral treatment with ganciclovir. Epstein-Barr virus encephalitis is rare in immunocompetent adults, which can easily cause misdiagnosis and should be paid attention to. mNGS of CSF has significant advantages in the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus encephalitis.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for diagnosis of fatal Balamuthia amoebic encephalitis.

INTRODUCTION: Balamuthia amoebic encephalitis (BAE), caused by Balamuthia mandrillaris, is a rare and life-threatening infectious disease with no specific and effective treatments available. The diagnosis of BAE at an early stage is difficult because of the non-specific clinical manifestations and neuroimaging. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 52-year-old male patient, who had no previous history of skin lesions, presented to the emergency department with an acute headache, walking difficulties, and disturbance of consciousness. The patient underwent a series of examinations, including regular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies and magnetic resonance imaging, and tuberculous meningoencephalitis was suspected. Despite being treated with anti-TB drugs, no clinical improvement was observed in the patient. Following corticosteroid therapy, the patient developed a rapid deterioration in consciousness with dilated pupils. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) revealed an unexpected central nervous system (CNS) amoebic infection, and the patient died soon after the confirmed diagnosis. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the application of mNGS for the diagnosis of patients with suspected encephalitis or meningitis, especially those caused by rare opportunistic infections.

Evaluation of pathogen from the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel and recommendations on atypical findings.

BACKGROUND: Infectious meningoencephalitis is a potentially fatal clinical condition that causes inflammation of the central nervous system secondary to the installation of different microorganisms. The FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel allows the simultaneous detection of 14 pathogens with results in about one hour. OBJECTIVE: This study is based on retrospectively evaluating the implementation of the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel in a hospital environment, highlighting the general results and, especially, analyzing the consistency of the test results against the clinical and laboratory conditions of the patients. METHODS: Data were collected through the results reported by the BioFire FilmArray system software from the meningitis/encephalitis panel. The correlated laboratory tests used in our analysis, when available, included biochemical, cytological, direct and indirect microbiological tests. RESULTS: In the analyzed period, there were 496 samples with released results. Of the total of 496 samples analyzed, 88 (17.75%) were considered positive, and 90 pathogens were detected, and in 2 of these (2.27%) there was co-detection of pathogens. Viruses were the agents most frequently found within the total number of pathogens detected. Of the 496 proven samples, 20 (4.03%) were repeated, 5 of which were repeated due to invalid results, 6 due to the detection of multiple pathogens and 9 due to disagreement between the panel results and the other laboratory tests and/or divergence of the clinical-epidemiological picture. Of these 20 repeated samples, only 4 of them (20%) maintained the original result after repeating the test, with 16 (80%) being non-reproducible. The main factor related to the disagreement of these 16 samples during retesting was the detection of bacterial agents without any relationship with other laboratory tests or with the patients' clinical condition. CONCLUSION: In our study, simply reproducing tests with atypical results from the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel proved, in most cases, effective and sufficient for interpreting these results.

ANTECEDENTES: A meningoencefalite infecciosa é uma condição clínica potencialmente fatal que causa inflamação do sistema nervoso central secundária à instalação de diversos microrganismos. O painel de meningite/encefalite FilmArray permite a detecção simultânea de 14 patógenos, com resultados em cerca de uma hora. OBJETIVO: Este estudo baseia-se em avaliar retrospectivamente a implementação do painel de meningite/encefalite FilmArray em ambiente hospitalar, destacando os resultados gerais e, principalmente, analisando a consistência dos resultados do teste frente às condições clínicas e laboratoriais dos pacientes. MéTODOS: Os dados foram coletados por meio dos resultados relatados pelo software do sistema BioFire FilmArray do painel de meningite/encefalite. Os exames laboratoriais correlacionados utilizados em nossa análise, quando disponíveis, incluíram exames bioquímicos, citológicos, microbiológicos diretos e indiretos. RESULTADOS: No período analisado, foram 496 amostras com resultados divulgados. Do total de 496 amostras analisadas, 88 (17,75%) foram consideradas positivas e 90 patógenos foram detectados, sendo que em duas destas (2,27%) houve codetecção de patógenos. Os vírus foram os agentes mais frequentemente encontrados dentro do total de patógenos detectados. Das 496 amostras analisadas, 20 (4,03%) foram repetidas, sendo 5 repetidas por resultado inválido, 6 pela detecção de múltiplos patógenos e 9 por discordância dos resultados do painel com os demais exames laboratoriais e/ou divergência do quadro clínico-epidemiológico. Destas 20 amostras repetidas, apenas 4 delas (20%) mantiveram o resultado original após a repetição do teste, sendo 16 (80%) não reprodutíveis. O principal fator relacionado à discordância destas 16 amostras na retestagem foi a detecção de agentes bacterianos sem qualquer relação com os demais exames laboratoriais ou com o quadro clínico dos pacientes. CONCLUSãO: Em nosso estudo, a simples repetição dos testes com resultados atípicos do painel de meningite/encefalite FilmArray mostrou-se, na maior dos casos, efetiva e suficiente para a interpretação destes achados.

Encephalitis in HIV-negative immunodeficient patients: a prospective multicentre study, France, 2016 to 2019.

BackgroundData on infectious encephalitis in immunodeficient (ID) individuals are scarce. This population may present with atypical clinical symptoms, be infected by uncommon pathogens and develop poor outcomes.AimWe aimed to describe the epidemiology of infectious encephalitis among HIV-negative ID patients.MethodsPatients from the ENCEIF (Etude Nationale de Cohorte des Encéphalites Infectieuses en France) prospective cohort meeting criteria for infectious encephalitis between January 2016 and December 2019 were included. We compared clinical presentation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results, biological results, infection causes and outcome of ID patients with immunocompetent (IC) patients using Pearson's chi-squared test and Student's t-test. We carried out logistic regression to assess the role of immunodeficiency as risk factor for poor outcome.ResultsID patients (n = 58) were older (mean 72 vs 59 years), had higher prevalence of diabetes (26% vs 12%), pre-existing neurological disorders (12% vs 5%) and higher case-fatality rate (23.6% vs 5.6%) compared to IC patients (n = 436). Varicella zoster virus was the primary cause of encephalitis in ID patients (this aetiology was more frequent in ID (25.9%) than in IC patients (11.5%)), with herpes simplex virus second (22.4% in ID patients vs 27.3% in IC patients). Immunodeficiency was an independent risk factor for death or major sequelae (odds ratio: 3.41, 95%CI: 1.70-6.85).ConclusionsVaricella zoster virus is the most frequent cause of infectious encephalitis in ID patients. Immunodeficiency is a major risk factor for poor outcome. ID encephalitis patients should benefit from stringent investigation of cause and early empiric treatment.

Evaluating the Impact of the BioFire FilmArray in Childhood Meningitis: An Observational Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays have the potential to reduce antibiotic use and shorten length of inpatient stay in children with suspected central nervous system infection by obtaining an early microbiological diagnosis. The clinical impact of the implementation of the BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel on the management of childhood meningitis was evaluated at the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford and Children's Health Ireland at Temple Street in Dublin. METHODS: Children who had lumbar punctures performed as part of a septic screen were identified retrospectively through clinical discharge coding and microbiology databases from April 2017 to December 2018. Anonymized clinical and laboratory data were collected. Comparison of antibiotic use, length of stay and outcome at discharge was made with a historical cohort in Oxford (2012-2016), presenting before implementation of the FilmArray. RESULTS: The study included 460 children who had a lumbar puncture as part of an evaluation for suspected central nervous system infection. Twelve bacterial cases were identified on the FilmArray that were not detected by conventional bacterial culture. Bacterial culture identified one additional case of bacterial meningitis, caused by Escherichia coli , which had not been identified on the FilmArray. Duration of antibiotics was shorter in children when FilmArray was used than before its implementation; enterovirus meningitis (median: 4 vs. 5 days), human parechovirus meningitis (median: 4 vs. 4.5 days) and culture/FilmArray-negative cerebrospinal fluid (median: 4 vs. 6 days). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a FilmArray can identify additional bacterial cases of meningitis in children that had been negative by traditional culture methods. Children with viral meningitis and culture-negative meningitis received shorter courses of antibiotics and had shorter hospital stays when FilmArray was used. Large studies to evaluate the clinical impact and cost effectiveness of incorporating the FilmArray into routine testing are warranted.